Head and neck imaging manifestations in COVID-19: collective experience of 17 months during 2nd wave of the pandemic

Background: COVID-19 is well known to result in pulmonary and multiple extra-pulmonary manifestations. Among them, head and neck manifestations were commonly recognized in the 2nd wave of the pandemic. With the growing global COVID-19 burden, imaging is of utmost importance in diagnosing the disease and its related complications. The study aims to enumerate the various head and neck manifestations and their complications in COVID-19. Additionally, in sinusitis patients, the invasion was correlated with the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). Result(s): A cross-sectional observational study in which total of 78 COVID-19 cases that underwent head and neck imaging were retrospectively evaluated. The cohort included 52 males (66.7%) and 26 females (33.3%) with a mean age of 46.19 years (median = 49.0, SD = 16.47). The various head and neck manifestations included non invasive rhinosinusitis (n = 48), invasive sinusitis and its complications (n = 25), nasal septal abscess (n = 1), dacryoadenitis (n = 1), pre-septal and post-septal orbital cellulitis and its complications (n = 13), otitis media, mastoiditis and its complications (n = 6), parotitis (n = 2), neck vessel thrombosis (n = 2) and cervical lymphadenopathy (n = 3). An increase in the invasive nature of sinusitis was demonstrated among patients with comorbidities and elevated NLR. Conclusion(s): Early diagnosis and management of head and neck manifestations of COVID-19 are aided by prompt imaging. It is imperative that we are armed with the knowledge of various head and neck manifestations and how they may bear semblance to other pathologies for us to ensure COVID as a differential, especially in the background of known infection. Copyright © 2023, The Author(s).

Study of patterns of presentation in post COVID19 mucormycosis

Objective: To study the clinico-radiological presentation patterns in patients of post COVID-19 mucormycosis. Background: COVID-19 infection has been responsible for various neurological disorders like stroke, encephalitis, Guillain Barre syndrome etc. almost all over the world. The second wave of this deadly virus was followed by sudden upsurge of cases of mucormycosis in India. While the exact reason for this is still unknown, it is hypothesized to be attributed to steroid use in immunocompromised states like Diabetes Mellitus and possible contamination of intranasal oxygen with industrial oxygen. There have been various patterns of presentations of these patients to mucor units. Neurological involvement was seen in majority of these cases. This study was aimed to study clinical and radiological aspects of such patients. Design/Methods: Total 81 patients, diagnosed as mucormycosis after recovery from COVID-19 illness and who got admitted in mucor units of two tertiary care hospitals of India were included in the study. The presenting clinical features and radiological patterns of involvements were assessed. Results: Out of 81, 46(56.79%) were males and 35(43.21%) were females. Maximum 21(25.92%) patients were between 51-60 years. Most common presenting complaints were heaviness over cheek followed by headache, blurring of vision, nasal discharge, nasal crusting, chemosis of eye, decreased facial sensations and hemiparesis. MRI findings included sinusitis, cavernous sinus thrombosis, orbital cellulitis, anterior circulation infarcts and intracranial fungal abscesses. Rhino-orbital-cerebral mucormycosis was the most common pattern seen in 49(60.49%) patients followed by rhino-orbital form in 19(23.45%) patients and rhino-cerebral mucormycosis in the remaining 13(16.04%) patients. Conclusions: Mucormycosis has emerged as an important complication of COVID-19 infection after the second wave of pandemic in India. Major neurological manifestations have been seen to be associated with it. Lessons need to be learned from this mucormycosis epidemic for prevention of spread and management of this dreaded entity in other regions of the world.

Unilateral total ophthalmoplegia with proptosis and loss of vision in a patient of herpes zoster ophthalmicus: A rare case report

Herpes zoster Ophthalmicus accounts for a minority of all patients with zoster infections. It leads to varied clinical presentations, but total unilateral ophthalmoplegia has rarely been reported in the literature. We hereby present a 50-year-old male patient presenting with the above combination for aiding the clinical diagnosis by dermatologists and ophthalmologists. Early initiation of treatment leads to a near total recovery of ophthalmoplegia in the majority of treated patients.

Cranial nerve involvement in mucormycosis in post-COVID patients: a case series

Background: One of the largest outbreaks of rhinosinocerebral mucormycosis (RSCM) occurred in India close to the second wave of the SARS-CoV-2 infection. RSCM is a rare infection caused by several fungal species occurring in immunocompromised subjects. Mucor shows a high propensity to invade the central nervous system. There have been limited studies, mostly isolated case reports, on the neurological manifestations of RSCM. The outbreak of mucormycosis infection was thus the most opportune to study the neurological manifestations and cranial nerve involvement in mucormycosis in greater depths. Aim of the study: The purpose of the study was to investigate and review the involvement of cranial nerves in a series of cases of rhinosinocerebral mucormycosis associated with the novel coronavirus disease caused by SARS-CoV-2. Results: It was a retrospective cross-sectional study of seven patients who were undergoing treatment of RSCM with a recent history of coronavirus disease caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection within the last 3 months. Patients with cranial nerve involvement were identified by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at a single institution. Demographic details of the patients, clinical presentation, imaging, microbiological and pathological findings were recorded. All subjects had two or more cranial nerves affected by fungal infection. The most commonly involved cranial nerve was found to be the optic nerve followed by the trigeminal nerve and its branches. We document three cases with extensive involvement of the inferior alveolar branch of the mandibular division of the trigeminal nerve (V3), a previously unreported finding. In one case, in addition to the second and fifth cranial nerves, the third, fourth, sixth, seventh, eighth, and twelfth cranial nerves were involved without any sensory or motor long tract involvement, suggestive of Garcin syndrome secondary to intracranial abscesses and skull base osteomyelitis due to invasive fungal infection. This case is of rare occurrence in the literature, and our study provides one such example. Conclusion: Cranial nerve involvement in patients of mucormycosis tends to have a poor prognosis, both cosmetic and functional. Radical surgeries and aggressive medical management is needed in such cases to improve the outcome.

Radiologic Findings of COVID-19 Associated Mucormycosis (CAM) from India

Background. The unique feature of the second wave of the COVID -19 pandemic in India has been the alarming surge of acute invasive fungal infection among COVID -19 patients. The increased incidence of rhino-orbito-cerebral mucormycosis is a matter of concern, as this fulminant infection has high morbidity and mortality. Hence, it is imperative to understand it's imaging features, for early diagnosis, staging and treatment. Methods. We systematically reviewed 32 COVID-19 cases with imaging diagnosis of acute invasive fungal rhino-sinusitis or rhino-orbital-cerebral disease between March to May 2021. These patients underwent contrast MRI of the paranasal sinus, orbit and brain. Contrast enhanced CT chest and paranasal sinuses were done as needed. Results. The age group ranged between 30 to 71 yrs with male preponderance. The most common predisposing factors were intravenous steroid therapy and supplemental oxygen. All cases were confirmed by fungal culture and most common was Mucor. The rhino-orbito-cerebral mucormycosis was staged as below In our study we found that the most common site in the nasal cavity was the middle turbinate /meatus and the earliest sign was non-enhancing / "black" turbinate. Premaxillary and retroantral fat necrosis was the earliest sign of soft tissue invasion. Spread via the sphenopalatine foramen and pterygopalatine fossa was more common than bony erosions. Orbital cellulitis and optic neuritis were the most common among stage 3 cases. Of patients with CNS involvement, the most common were cavernous sinus thrombosis and trigeminal neuritis. Two patients with pulmonary mucormycosis showed large necrotic cavitary lesions, giving the characteristic "bird's nest" appearance. Conclusion. The mortality rate was 20% in our study. In our short term follow up, 30 % of recovered patients had relapse on imaging due to incomplete clearance and partial antifungal treatment. High clinical suspicion and low imaging threshold are vital for early Mucormycosis detection in COVID-19 patients. Familiarity with early imaging signs is critical to prevent associated morbidity /mortality. Axial CT chest image in lung window shows necrotic right upper lobe cavity with internal septations and debris on a background of surrounding COVID-19 changes.

A case of granulomatosis with polyangiitis complicated by COVID-19: Challenges in diagnosis and management

Case report-IntroductionGranulomatosis with Polyangiitis (GPA) is a rare small-to medium-vessel vasculitis associated with anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody (ANCA). Its multi-systemic features include pulmonary, ear, nose, and throat (ENT), renal, and neurological manifestations. Its incidence is estimated to be 10.2 cases per million population. It is challenging to diagnose when its symptoms are treated in isolation from one another. This case highlights the difficulty in diagnosing GPA in a patient with respiratory symptoms during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and describes the challenges of managing it in the context of a subsequent COVID-19 infection as the mainstay of treatment remains immunosuppression.Case report-Case descriptionA 78-year-old female non-smoker with a history of leg ulcers developed a 3-month history of cough and haemoptysis and was treated in primary care for suspected sinus and chest infections. She then presented to Accident and Emergency twice for the same symptoms and was discharged after having her antibiotics changed.2 weeks later, she presented for the third time with cough, ongoing haemoptysis, conjunctivitis in the right eye, pain over the right side of her head, and discharge from her right ear. She was admitted as she was pyrexical, tachycardic and her CRP was 60. COVID-19 swabs were negative. ENT team recommended IV ceftriaxone and metronidazole for suspected orbital cellulitis. Blood cultures remained negative. CT sinuses with contrast showed right sided thrombosis of transverse sinus and bilateral mastoid effusion of the middle ear. Following neurology review, she was anticoagulated with dalteparin. A day later, she was transferred to the Respiratory ward and dropped her Haemoglobin level to 70. Her chest radiograph showed diffuse alveolar haemorrhage and CT images showed widespread bilateral peri-hilar consolidation.A rheumatology opinion was sought and vasculitic screen showed ANCA 268, and PR3 >177. Her urinary protein/creatinine ratio was elevated at 90. Rheumatology team confirmed multi-systemic GPA and recommended starting oral Prednisolone 60 mg daily. After the renal team was consulted, she was moved to a side-room and started on IV Methylprednisolone (pulsed with three doses), along with cyclophosphamide and rituximab. Dalteparin was discontinued.2 days later, she desaturated, and became pyrexical. Repeat COVID-19 swabs were positive.Three Consultants agreed that Plasma Exchange and Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV) would be inappropriate. A Do Not Attempt Resuscitation form was signed, and prognosis was discussed with the patient and her 78-year-old husband who requested to visit. Patient deteriorated and unfortunately died 6 days later.Case report-DiscussionThis case is interesting because it highlights the diagnostic challenge of GPA. Retrospectively, it may be noted that doctors persisted in treating suspected infection although the patient continued to deteriorate. However, a diagnosis should be re-considered if the patient does not respond to treatment and it is important to consider vasculitis as a cause of haemoptysis.Anticoagulation was started since the benefits were considered to outweigh the risks as her haemoptysis was of small volume. The patient soon developed pulmonary haemorrhage, so the risks of anticoagulation should not be underestimated in vasculitis.The Rheumatology team's cautious approach to immunosuppression was in stark contrast to the renal team's aggressive approach. The Renal team believed that concerns about protecting the patient from COVID-19 when she was negative from this infection should not take precedence over appropriate immunosuppression from a potentially fatal vasculitis.The patient was admitted at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic and was negative for COVID-19 on admission. She was nursed in a bay on the Respiratory ward where she later became COVID-19 positive. This raises questions about whether the earlier test was a false negative result or whether her infection was hospital-acquired. Infection cont ol guidelines were changing rapidly at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic.The decision to avoid plasma exchange was based on the findings of the PEXIVAS trial. NIV was avoided as it required a full-face mask to minimize particle dispersion but would pose an asphyxiation risk as patient was coughing up blood.Finally, the team learnt to be flexible in these extraordinary circumstances when dealing with the end-of-life decisions of the COVID-19 positive patient. Although her husband was a vulnerable person because of his age, he was given the opportunity to visit while wearing Personal Protective Equipment and agreed to self-isolate for two weeks.Case report-Key learning pointsThis case helped me appreciate the complexity of deciding to immunosuppress an already severely ill patient in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. I recognised that the patient had a poor prognosis with or without immunosuppression and our role as healthcare professionals was to give her the best chance of recovery. The conference will allow me to interact with other colleagues and discuss what they would do in this situation as our Rheumatology and Renal teams had different approaches.After further reading on false negative results, we found that Johns Hopkins researchers found that testing people for SARS-CoV2 too early in the course of infection is likely to result in a false negative test even though they may eventually test positive for the virus.I have also learnt about the PEXIVAS trial which found that the addition of plasma exchange to standard therapy does not reduce the risk for all-cause mortality among patients with severe ANCA-associated vasculitis. Moreover, a reduced-dose regimen of glucocorticoids is non-inferior to a standard-dose protocol, while reducing the risk for serious infections.Diffuse alveolar haemorrhage (DAH) is not treatable with arterial embolization or bronchoscopic methods due to the diffuse nature of the bleeding. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been used to support patients with DAH but the use of ECMO is controversial due to the need for anticoagulation.The conference will help me deepen my understanding of epidemic rheumatology which will be useful for my clinical practice going forward, especially if there is a second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. I am keen to use this event to engage with other clinicians on immunosuppression in the context of infection so that I may confidently manage similarly complex cases in the future.